Curleys wife in the story Of Mice And Men - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 705 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/06/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Of Mice And Men Essay Did you like this example? Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. These lines are spoken by Winston Churchill. The novel is set in the farmland of the Salinas valley, where the author (John Steinbeck) was born. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Curleys wife in the story Of Mice And Men" essay for you Create order The story Of Mice And Men tells the story about two displaced migrant workers named George Milton and Lennie Small. The struggle between moving town after town just to find job opportunities in California during the Great Depression. Of Mice And Men shows us the self consciousness of George, Lennie, Candy, Crooks, And Curleyrs wife. All characters at one time found themselves in a sense of loneliness and isolation. The importance of the American dream through the eyes of George and Lennie shows everyone to keep going if it doesnt work. George shows many different ways on how he wants to live his life. In the novel Of Mice and Men, George and Lennie have always dreamed of moving away and buying a house on a farm where George and Lennie can be alone and free. Unfortunately, George and Lennie had no money, making it sorrowful. George would always speak out loud to Lennie about how their dream farm is going to be, well said george, well have a big vegetable patch and a rabbit hutch and chickens and when it rains in the winter, well build up a fire in the stove and set about it an listen to all that rain coming down from the roof(Steinbeck 16-17). George sees the future as an imagination through his brain of what he wants from his dream farm. Through the dreams of George and Lennie, in order to be successful, both need to work hard to achieve it. Next, George explains to his friends how they have nothing, since it is the great depression all they do is work. Guys like us, that work on ranches, are the loneliest guys in the world. They got no family. They dont belong no place. They come to a ranch an work up a stake and then they go inta town and blow their stake, and the first thing you know theyre poundin their tail on some other ranch. They aint got nothing to look ahead to(Steinbeck 8). The hardest obstacle for George and Lennie are to keep on moving through life. Without parents or family to support you, morals in life will give a person a struggle into growing up. The motivation and dream that George and Lennie shows us is that they wont back down till they get what they want. Distant goals are often set as objectives to the most superior American Dream. Accordingly, it is not that the dream is isolated, but that people set unreachable, not pragmatic, goals. With Curleys wife, she always had this dream to become an appealing and stunning model and actress. She expressed her feelings to Lennie about how she cannot become either of those. Coulda been in the movies, an had nice clothes .An I coulda sat in them big hotels, an had pitchers took of me(Steinbeck 44). Curleys wife only wants to be famous, she doesnt really care about Curly. The goal being an actress and a model shows that she cares about herself and no one else. Curleyrs wife dreams about what she wants but can she pursue the words she said. Life of Curleyrs wife is all imagination, caring only about herself means she only uses Curley for money and shelter. Curleyrs wife will do anything just to be a famous actress, getting a handler to star in movies is a start, Can she trust anyone? Curleyrs wif e states, a guy was in pitchers. Went out to the Riverside dances with him. He said he was gonna put me in the moviesSoons as be got back to hollywood, he was gonna write to me about it(Steinbeck 88). The man that Curleys wife was conversing with about acting, he never talked to her again. Now, she talks about that dream and what she could have been. Overall, she wants to leave Curly, run away from the ranch, and have her own freedom. She wants to be famous and have a tremendous acting career.

An Analysis of John F. Kennedys Civil Rights Address

At the height of the Cold War, racial tensions in the United States were also reaching a breaking point. This era brought with it many of the seminal events in civil-rights history: the start of the Freedom Rides in 1961, the University of Mississippi’s admission of its first black student, and the Birmingham riots of 1963. While America struggled with the ever-present threat of nuclear war, this other kind of conflict threatened to undermine and demoralize America from within. It is 11 June, 1963, and the Alabama National Guardsmen are called to the University of Alabama to ensure the safe admission of two black students. That same afternoon, John F. Kennedy addresses the nation in an attempt to sooth flared tempers on both sides of the†¦show more content†¦World War II and the Nazi regime, though supplanted by fears of nuclear conflict and communism, would surely be a painful memory for many Americans. This allusion to the espoused ideologies of Hitler and his ilk w as calculated to associate segregation with those ideas. This is a further emotional appeal to the patriotism of Americans. His audience would be instantly repulsed by the idea of having such similarities to a despot and dictatorship, the antithesis of the very things which they love. It is also a logical appeal; to suggest that America would love her ideals and yet not adhere to them is illogical. By drawing attention to this, Kennedy further impresses upon his audience the need for change, and their duty in that change. During this call for change, Kennedy does not alienate his audience by putting himself above the need for reform. Throughout the text he speaks with an unequivocal tone, but also draws attention to his own status as a citizen. He greets the audience as â€Å"fellow citizens†; he uses inclusive words such as â€Å"us† and â€Å"we†; he goes on to describe the actions he personally intends to take. In this way, he is communicating to his audience that he is not absolved of responsibility because of his presidency, but equally responsible because he is equally a citizen of the nation. In theShow MoreRelatedThe Leadership Styles And Behavioral Analysis1532 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past—let us accept our own responsibility for the future† -John F. Kennedy, 35th US President. This paper describes about the Leadership styles and Behavioral analysis of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy. Elected in 1960 as the 35th president of the United States, John F. Kennedy was the youngest man to hold that office. He was born on May 29, 1917, in BrooklineRead MoreThe Leadership Styles And Behavioral Analysis1687 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction â€Å"Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past—let us accept our own responsibility for the future† -John F. Kennedy, 35th US President. This paper describes about the Leadership styles and Behavioral analysis of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy. Elected in 1960 as the 35th president of the United States, John F. Kennedy was the youngest man to hold that office. He was born on May 29, 1917, in BrooklineRead MoreWhat Did The Assassination Of John. F Kennedy Affect The Civil Right Movement?2205 Words   |  9 Pagesassassination of John. F Kennedy affect the civil right movement?† The years from 1963-1964 will be the focus of this investigation, to allow for the analysis from the year of Kennedy’s assassination and to the end of the civil rights movement. This investigation will mainly focus on Lyndon B. Johnson participation during the civil rights movement but also other outside factors. This includes Martin Luther King. Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society and Legacies of the 1964 Civil Rights Act are the twoRead MoreThe Great American Speech By Robert F. Kennedy2346 Words   |  10 PagesI am bewildered by the fact that one of the greatest American speeches ever written is unknown to the majority of the Ameri can public. A speech so powerful that it prevented a major city from rioting. The words of Robert F. Kennedy on April 4th, 1968 in Indianapolis, Indiana still persists strong in the sight of his burial in Arlington Cemetery and in the minds and hearts of the individuals who got to witness this live. The speech was known to be so dynamic that some scholarly institutions like thatRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement Essay2043 Words   |  9 Pagesthe Civil Rights Movement? The Civil Rights Movement and President Johnson are closely linked in history. Though there were many other faces to the Civil Rights Movement, Johnson’s was one of the most publicly viewed and instrumental in its passing. It was Johnson who carried the weight and responsibilities of the issue after the assassination of JFK, and it was he who would sign it. Lyndon B Johnson was the most influential forces in establishing the movement that would ensure civil rights forRead MoreEssay about The Many Benefits of Affirmative Action2038 Words   |  9 Pages An affirmative action timeline In 1961, John F. Kennedy signed an executive order that intended the end of discrimination in federal contracting. The Contractor will take affirmative action, to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin. (1) The act did not mandate quotas, only discrimination-free employment practices. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 broadened this policy. Title IV declaredRead MoreAmerican Revolution and Study Guide Essay example5377 Words   |  22 Pagesdemocracy developing in colonial America Pocahontas Anne Hutchinson Benjamin Franklin Royal veto John Rolfe Roger Williams George Whitefield Lord Baltimore William Bradford John Peter Zenger Virtual representation Walter Raleigh John Winthrop Paxton boys James Oglethorpe Puritans Triangular trade First Continental Congress John Smith Separatists Molasses Act Sugar Act Francis Drake Pilgrims Scots-Irish Quartering Act Read More Affirmative Action Essay2990 Words   |  12 Pagestoday’s society or if such policy should be done away with, and, finally, possible resolutions to this dilemma, will be reviewed, beginning with the explanation of how affirmative action came about. In March l96I, less than two months after President John F. Kennedy took office, he issued an Executive Order (10925), which established the Presidents Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity. Its mission was to end discrimination in employment by the government and its contractors. The order requiredRead MoreThe War Of The Vietnam War3899 Words   |  16 PagesThe American involvement in the Vietnam War created widespread division between the American people. There were many United States citizens who believed that the United States was involved in the Vietnam struggle for the right reasons, in order to prevent communism from taking over South Vietnam. There were also other citizens who believed that the United States was involved over there for the wrong reasons, due to the feeling that it was none of our business, and that it was considered another formRead MoreImpact of Consumer Protection Agencie in Nigeria15948 Words   |  64 Pagescare of themselves. Consumer Protection l aws are a form of government regulation which aim to protect the rights of consumers. For example, a government may require businesses to disclose detailed information about products—particularly in areas where safety or public health is an issue, such as food. Consumer protection is linked to the idea of consumer rights (that consumers have various rights as consumers), and to the formation of consumer organizations which help consumers make better choices

Contemporary Society

Question: A significant debate in the field of sociology ? Answer: Introducation: A significant debate in the field of sociology in the recent years has been on the topic of whether religion and science are mutually irrelevant and scholars from across the world have responded to the argument. The common notion prevalent among the societies is that the war between theology and science is a coarse oversimplification and the topic is a deformed piece of propaganda[1]. The present essay compares and contrasts religion with science from the point of view of sociology. It explains whether science is a form of religion and whether religion and science are similar social constructions. The essay considers both the relationship between proof and faith and how irrational social factors influence every aspect of life. Religion and science are not to be regarded as enemies. However, they are not friends either. Religion and science are mutually irrelevant, and they are the representation of tow domain that is non-overlapping. The concept that individuals have in their minds is that religion is to deal with faith whereas science is to deal with facts and reality. Nevertheless, this concept is an unpleasant misrepresentation of religion and science. When the universe is being probed from the scientific viewpoint, there is a number of question and problems that are encountered which are predominantly philosophical in character. There is often a lack of scientific explanations for these questions, but theological perspectives may illuminate the solutions of the issues[2]. It is not true that religion does not contribute towards factual claims regarding any societal issues. The authors argue that religion makes various conflicting claims about the origin of humanity and how the universe works but all of them cannot be true. Religion and science are therefore just like two circles intersecting each other or rather partially overlapping each other[3]. The last few decades have been witnessing a thriving dialogue between theology and religion. To discuss about implications of science for theology is a matter of much speculation. The authors explore different aspects in which religion and science serve as collaborators in the search for truth. Firstly, religion fosters the conceptual framework for science to flourish in. Moreover, the complete scientific enterprise has the foundation on different assumptions that are not possible to be proved in a scientific manner but are guaranteed by the religious world view. Secondly, science has the power to verify as well as falsify claims made by religion. When religion puts forward claims regarding the natural world, there is a fine line of intersection with the sphere of science. Thirdly, science comes across different metaphysical issues that religion can help in solving. Science has often been known for an insatiable quest for an explanation. But the ability of science to hold up explanat ions is limited, and this is where religion can help. An individual who has the belief in God is possessed with a strong force of resources that can be applied for getting the ultimate explanations for any arising question. Next, religion helps in the adjudication between stories of science. The adoption of a number of scientific theories rests on philosophical presuppositions. In addition, religion has the ability to augment the instructive influence of science. Lastly, science establishes a premise in certain arguments where the conclusion has religious significance[4]. There has been an ongoing debate regarding the differences between religion and science and different issues set them apart. Though the differences between the two schools are far reaching, the similarities are also significant. Both religion and science have the basis on a never-ending search for more knowledge and wisdom. Many religions have a strong emphasis on the idea that researchers are to obtain more knowledge of wisdom and self and the earth for coming closer to the holy spirit. This can be done through prophecy, traditions and nature symbology. Likewise, science puts the emphasis on the need for researchers to understand and identify all forms of wisdom and knowledge to come closer to nature. This can be done through ideas, symbolism and textbooks. Keeping this in view, religion and science are found to be two different groups of thoughts with each having a possession of a rich pool of information beneficial for humanity and nature[5]. There that there are similarities betw een science and religion since each claims to be the real truth. In this regard, several elitists and purists view them to be mutually exclusive[6]. Many schools of thoughts have compared and contrasted religion and science from the sociological point of view. One of the fundamental differences between religion and science is that unlike religion science can undergo changes. Religion and theology do not undergo any changes once it has been established among the common. Science has theory and evidence, and they claim things to be true since they fit in different theories and evidence. However, with the emergence of a new theory ann previous theory can be proved wrong and scientists may consider not applying it any further. For instance, the theory of relativism of Albert Einstein has proved the laws of motion of Newton to be invalid outside the world. In contrast, religion resists changes completely. This leads to conflict between scientists and churches and epistemologies change often[7]. In contrast to science, religion is reliant on faith. A religious person believes in a lot of things that he cannot see. This is not the case f or science. Science aways demands proofs for supporting the theories and thesis[8]. A number of scientists have put forward rationales and theories that aim to prove that the universe is not created by God. For example, Stephen Hawking strives to prove that God has no role in creating the universe and makes God redundant. According to the famous scientist, if researchers can find the fundamental laws of nature then we can understand how God function and what are the implications being held for us. The search for the Holy one is almost over, and the behaviour of all basic particles and forces accounts for all origins in the universe. It is prominent that scientists contributing most enthusiastically to the disagreements are from the field of fundamental physics and evolutionary biology[9]. Many scientists belive that science is more advanced over the theories and religion, and there are major fundamental differences between theories and experiments. Even if a theory or belief is beautiful, it will get discarded if not backed up by any proof[10]. In conclusion, it can be stated that science and religion have their own cosmology, belief and sanctity and each has their own impact on the lives of people. The logic of religion and science are challenging in their own respect and an ordinary individual can believe in all of them. We are living in the advanced level of technologies and at the top of modernity; however, religion still has a major influence on our daily lives. The debate of which is more powerful religion and science would continue for ever, and from the social viewpoint new ideas may be coming up highlighting the interrelation between science and religion. There are many comparables between religion and science, and there are few reasons to place them totally at odds. Bibliography Clulee, Nicholas.John Dee's natural philosophy: Between science and religion. Routledge, 2013. Coleman III, Thomas J. "James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?The Cognitive Science Debate."Review of Religious Research58, no. 3 (2016): 459-461. Greenway, Tyler S. "Can science explain religion? The cognitive science debate, James W. Jones." (2017): 1-2. Polanyi, Michael.Science, faith, and society. University of Chicago Press, 2013. Ross Jr, John.Science Religion: A Handbook for Interpersonal Dialogue, Discussion and Debate. Xlibris Corporation, 2016. Schtz, Gunter M. "Faith and Science: Friend or Foe?."Contemporary Physics57, no. 1 (2016): 104-109. Smart, Ninian.The science of religion and the sociology of knowledge: Some methodological questions. Princeton University Press, 2015. Stahl, Devan. "Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism." (2017): 1-4. Warren, Elizabeth Curran.The Religion-Science Debate. AuthorHouse, 2016. Weldon, Stephen P. "1 Science and Religion."Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction(2017): 1. [1] Warren, Elizabeth Curran.The Religion-Science Debate. AuthorHouse, 2016. [2] Coleman III, Thomas J. "James W. Jones: Can Science Explain Religion?The Cognitive Science Debate."Review of Religious Research58, no. 3 (2016): 459-461. [3] Smart, Ninian.The science of religion and the sociology of knowledge: Some methodological questions. Princeton University Press, 2015. [4] Ross Jr, John.Science Religion: A Handbook for Interpersonal Dialogue, Discussion and Debate. Xlibris Corporation, 2016. [5] Stahl, Devan. "Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism." (2017): 1-4. [6] Clulee, Nicholas.John Dee's natural philosophy: Between science and religion. Routledge, 2013. [7] Weldon, Stephen P. "1 Science and Religion."Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction(2017): 1. [8] Greenway, Tyler S. "Can science explain religion? The cognitive science debate, James W. Jones." (2017): 1-2. [9] Polanyi, Michael.Science, faith, and society. University of Chicago Press, 2013. [10] Schtz, Gunter M. "Faith and Science: Friend or Foe?."Contemporary Physics57, no. 1 (2016): 104-109.